next up previous
Next: Sensitivity of pointing offset Up: Sensitivity of pointing calibration Previous: Sensitivity of pointing calibration

Sensitivity of antenna amplitude gain determination

Assume we have an interferometer with N antennas. We want to determine the power gain tex2html_wrap_inline834 of antenna i, by observing a point source of flux density S.

The quantities we measure are the baseline amplitudes: Let us note tex2html_wrap_inline840 the amplitude of the correlation product of the outputs of antennas i and j.

One has:

displaymath846

which may be written, since the power gains tex2html_wrap_inline834 are positive:

displaymath850

where tex2html_wrap_inline852 , and tex2html_wrap_inline854 . We thus have N (N-1) linear equations to solve for the N unknowns tex2html_wrap_inline860 . Such a system is usually solved using the method of least squares. One minimizes:

displaymath862

for which the N conditions are:

displaymath866

which may be rewritten as:

displaymath868

Adding these equations one obtains:

displaymath870

It is then straightforward to substitute this back and get:

displaymath872

Here the second term contains all the baseline amplitudes. This formula is derived in a much more elegant way (and in French) by E. Anterrieu ([1992]). Let's rewrite it in a slightly different way:

displaymath874

Now the first term contains all baselines connected to antenna i, the second one contains all the other baselines; for instance for 3 antennas, one obtains the well-known formula:

displaymath878

Now all the tex2html_wrap_inline880 contain noise terms which are uncorrelated. Then for the corresponding r.m.s. fluctuations we get:

  equation82

In the large signal-to-noise limit: tex2html_wrap_inline882 , tex2html_wrap_inline884 . Let us assume further that all antennas have the same gain tex2html_wrap_inline886 and sensitivity: tex2html_wrap_inline888  :

displaymath890

displaymath892

The rms of the power gain is thus behaving like tex2html_wrap_inline894 in the large N limit. This is because in Eq. 1 the first (N-1) terms are going to dominate the summation when N is large, since the other (N-1)(N-2)/2 are multiplied by a tex2html_wrap_inline904 factor. The rms gain also diverges for N <3: it is well-known that it is not possible to measure the gain of a single antenna in a two-element interferometer. This formula slightly differs from that of Cornwell and Fomalont ([1989]); the asymptotic behaviour is the same ( tex2html_wrap_inline908 for the amplitude gains) but their result diverges for N=3.

In the case of heterogeneous arrays the previous analysis has to be refined; We do this in Appendix A. The result for a large number of antennas is simply:

displaymath912

where tex2html_wrap_inline914 is the gain of kind 1 , tex2html_wrap_inline916 the rms in one baseline connecting two antennas of kind 1, and A is the total collecting area of the array.


next up previous
Next: Sensitivity of pointing offset Up: Sensitivity of pointing calibration Previous: Sensitivity of pointing calibration