Next: Dynamic Scheduling
Up: Proposal Submission and Handling
Previous: Basic requirements
  Contents
- Links to databases like SIMBAD or NED should be available to
define coordinates. On the basis of a map (from survey databases, or
from databases of previous observations) one should be able to
define the area to be mapped interactively with a mouse. It would be
useful to use existing ALMA (or other) observations as an input data
base for defining observations.
- There should be a simulator (attached to the proposal
preparation tool) to produce S/N, dirty beams and, for suitable
source models, maps with the desired configurations. There should
be a database of real data as input (e.g. if one wants to map a
source in HCN(4-3), one could use an already existing HCN(3-2) map
as input), and easy-to-construct models by defining basic source
components: disks, Gaussians, tori etc. One should aim at getting
something like the NCSA Astronomy Digital Image Library for ALMA and
linking this to the simulator tool. This depends on the policy for
data archives to become publicly accessible.
- There should be graphical tools for e.g. correlator setup, such as
those in use at BIMA and SMA. This should be
linked to existing line surveys for a variety of sources, to be
able to place correlator units visually at interesting regions, or
to simulated spectra based on physical models. This means a line
database (such as the JPL catalog) should also be linked to the tool.
Next: Dynamic Scheduling
Up: Proposal Submission and Handling
Previous: Basic requirements
  Contents
Kate Weatherall
2000-03-08